Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZ

324 Richmond St W; 326 Richmond St W; 328 Richmond St W; 330 Richmond St W; 332 Richmond St W

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 16 February 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 8; 6 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 324 Richmond St W; 326 Richmond St W; 328 Richmond St W; 330 Richmond St W; 332 Richmond St W
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 16 February 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 310 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application to construct new mixed use building with retail on ground floor and residential above. - 25 storeys - 5 levels below grade parking - 151 parking spaces - 310 residential units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine · registration SM17328
324 and 332 Richmond Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17328: 324 and 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZ at 326 Richmond St W: Rezoning application to construct new mixed use building with retail on ground floor and residential above. - 25 storeys - 5 levels below grade parking - 151 parking spaces - 310 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 and 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
address
332 RICHMOND ST W
application_address
332 RICHMOND ST W
Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine · registration SM17312
324 to 332 Richmond Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17312: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZ at 326 Richmond St W: Rezoning application to construct new mixed use building with retail on ground floor and residential above. - 25 storeys - 5 levels below grade parking - 151 parking spaces - 310 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
address
332 RICHMOND ST W
application_address
332 RICHMOND ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 8 communications · 6 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina7
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	7	6	28 October 2013
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Councillor staff	1	0	12 August 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Sherman Brown Dryer Karol2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	11%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=6)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.