Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
328 Richmond St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64901, -79.39245
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 326 RICHMOND ST W (2 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 13 November 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 248414 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 March 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 134958 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 February 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 248414 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 13 November 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 134958 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 March 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 124056 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 February 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
324 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
14 134958 STE 20 SA · submitted 28 March 2014 · Closed · from registration SM17312 (Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17312: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 134958 STE 20 SA at 324 Richmond St W: To obtain site plan approval for the construction of a 25 storey mixed use condo building containing 311 residential units plus 1 guest suite (12 bachelor, 238 one bedroom, 58 two bedroom, and 3 units with three or more bedrooms). Retail uses will be located on the ground floor. 150 parking spaces … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
324 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
14 134958 STE 20 SA · submitted 28 March 2014 · Closed · from registration SM23568 (Petaluma Building Corp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23568: discussion about building height and parking for 324-332 Richmond St West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 134958 STE 20 SA at 324 Richmond St W: To obtain site plan approval for the construction of a 25 storey mixed use condo building containing 311 residential units plus 1 guest suite (12 bachelor, 238 one bedroom, 58 two bedroom, and 3 units with three or more bedrooms). Retail uses will be located on the ground floor. 150 parking spaces … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: discussion about building height and parking for 324-332 Richmond St West.
Matched fields
- address
- 324-332 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 324 RICHMOND ST W
326 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 124056 STE 20 OZ · submitted 16 February 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17312 (Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17312: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZ at 326 Richmond St W: Rezoning application to construct new mixed use building with retail on ground floor and residential above. - 25 storeys - 5 levels below grade parking - 151 parking spaces - 310 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
326 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 124056 STE 20 OZ · submitted 16 February 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17328 (Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17328: 324 and 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZ at 326 Richmond St W: Rezoning application to construct new mixed use building with retail on ground floor and residential above. - 25 storeys - 5 levels below grade parking - 151 parking spaces - 310 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 and 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.