Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

330 Richmond St W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 1; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64889, -79.39256
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 16 February 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
12 124056 STE 20 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	16 February 2012	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

326 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 124056 STE 20 OZ · submitted 16 February 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17312 (Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17312: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZ at 326 Richmond St W: Rezoning application to construct new mixed use building with retail on ground floor and residential above. - 25 storeys - 5 levels below grade parking - 151 parking spaces - 310 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
address
332 RICHMOND ST W
application_address
332 RICHMOND ST W
326 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 124056 STE 20 OZ · submitted 16 February 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17328 (Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17328: 324 and 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 124056 STE 20 OZ at 326 Richmond St W: Rezoning application to construct new mixed use building with retail on ground floor and residential above. - 25 storeys - 5 levels below grade parking - 151 parking spaces - 310 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 and 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
address
332 RICHMOND ST W
application_address
332 RICHMOND ST W

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	11%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=6)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.