lobbyTO

Registration SM17902 · in-house

Starlight Investments

Status: closed by lro15 March 2012 to 31 December 2015Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
2
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
1
Published links only

Who

Client
Starlight Investments
Registrant
Daniel Drimmer
Type
in-house
Status
closed by lro
Dates
Approved 19 March 2012; 15 March 2012 to 31 December 2015

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law
  • Planning and Development Application, Site Plan

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Starlight and its subsidiary company intend to file planning applications to redevelop the property municipally described as 200 Ridley Blvd., in Toronto.

Addresses named: 200 Ridley Blvd (Ward 8)

Automated summary of the registration text

Starlight and its subsidiary company are registered, communicating about planning applications for 200 Ridley Blvd.

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2012-06 to 2012-06

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1111 June 2012
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
11 June 2012Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceKaren Stintz
Member of council
—MeetingJulianna Boldt

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored