Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 12 176173 NNY 16 SA

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 18 May 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 200 Ridley Blvd
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 18 May 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 12 176179 NNY 16 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

The site contains an existing 91 unit 4-storey apartment building. The applicant proposes to redevelop the vacant front portion of the site, which includes the front lawn, circular driveway and surface parking lot, with 19 multiple attached dwelling units (townhouses) and one-single family dwelling at the eastern end of the site abutting the existing single-family homes. A total of 33 parking spaces would be provided for the townhouse units in an underground garage with 29 spaces dedicated for residents and 4 for visitors. A new 2-way driveway located at the southwest portion of the site replaces the existing circular driveway and will provide access to the existing apartment building and proposed townhouses. The townhouses would be 3-storeys and approximately 12 metres in height.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Starlight Investments and Kanco 200 Ridley Ltd. · registration SM20797
Zoning and site plan applications to develop 200 Ridley Boulevard
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20797: Zoning and site plan applications to develop 200 Ridley Boulevard (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 176173 NNY 16 SA at 200 Ridley Blvd: The site contains an existing 91 unit 4-storey apartment building. The applicant proposes to redevelop the vacant front portion of the site, which includes the front lawn, circular driveway and surface parking lot, with 19 multiple attached dwelling units (townhouses) and one-single family dwelling… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning and site plan applications to develop 200 Ridley Boulevard
Matched fields
address
200 RIDLEY BLVD
application_address
200 RIDLEY BLVD
Starlight Investments · registration SM17902
Starlight and its subsidiary company intend to file planning applications to redevelop the property municipally described as 200 Ridley Blvd., in Toronto.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17902: Starlight and its subsidiary company intend to file planning applications to redevelop the property municipally described as 200 Ridley Blvd., in Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 176173 NNY 16 SA at 200 Ridley Blvd: The site contains an existing 91 unit 4-storey apartment building. The applicant proposes to redevelop the vacant front portion of the site, which includes the front lawn, circular driveway and surface parking lot, with 19 multiple attached dwelling units (townhouses) and one-single family dwelling… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ight and its subsidiary company intend to file planning applications to redevelop the property municipally described as 200 Ridley Blvd., in Toronto.
Matched fields
address
200 RIDLEY BLVD
application_address
200 RIDLEY BLVD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	1	1	11 June 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amber Stewart Law1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 69 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=2

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied8%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 69 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	25	—	100% (n=3)	0%	8%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	69	—	100% (n=2)	0%	4%	0.00

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.