lobbyTO

Registration SM35497 · consultant

Samuel Sarick Limited

Status: active11 April 2024 to 10 April 2027Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
68
5 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
1
Published links only
Linked applications
0
Published links only

Who

Client
Samuel Sarick Limited
Consultant firm
StrategyCorp Inc.
Registrant
Aidan Grove-White
Type
consultant
Status
active
Dates
Approved 12 April 2024; 11 April 2024 to 10 April 2027

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development
  • Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study
  • Planning and Development, Environmental Assessment

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Golden Mile Secondary Plan, O Connor Drive Extension to Birchmount. Impact on properties located at 1911 and 1921 Eglinton Avenue East.

Addresses named: 1921 Eglinton Ave E (Ward 20)

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered, communicating about Golden Mile Secondary Plan and O Connor Drive Extension to Birchmount regarding impact on properties located at 1911 and 1921 Eglinton Avenue East.

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2024-05 to 2026-07

68 communications, most in 2024-05 (12)

How and with whom

By method · 16 meetings

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

Offices contacted· 5 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Development Review DivisionCity staff5298 July 2026
Parthi KandavelCouncillor staff7511 December 2025
Dianne SaxeMember of council4028 May 2024
Parthi KandavelMember of council3211 December 2025
Dianne SaxeCouncillor staff2027 May 2024
All communications· 68 rows
68 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
8 July 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
17 June 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
15 June 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
11 June 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
9 June 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
8 June 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
5 June 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
25 May 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
20 May 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
11 May 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
7 May 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
5 May 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
4 May 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
30 April 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
27 April 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
23 April 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
—
15 April 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
14 April 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
24 March 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
—
24 March 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
—
11 March 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
—
12 February 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
26 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Other
Other:Text Message
—
22 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Other
Other:Text Message
—
21 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
21 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
8 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting
Meeting;Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
8 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
8 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
7 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
6 January 2026Development Review Division—
City staff
—Other
Other:Text Message
—
19 December 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
19 December 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
12 December 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Other
Other:Text Message
—
11 December 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
11 December 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
11 December 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Meeting—
11 December 2025Office of Councillor Parthi Kandavel (Ward 20)Vidya Rajasingam
Councillor staff
Parthi KandavelMeeting—
11 December 2025Office of Councillor Parthi Kandavel (Ward 20)Anushanthan Manoharan
Councillor staff
Parthi KandavelMeeting—
11 December 2025Office of Councillor Parthi Kandavel (Ward 20)Adrian Molder
Councillor staff
Parthi KandavelMeeting—
11 December 2025Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestParthi Kandavel
Member of council
Parthi KandavelMeeting—
19 November 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
19 November 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;E-mail
—
31 October 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
31 October 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
31 October 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
31 October 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
30 October 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;E-mail;Other:Text Message
—
29 October 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Other
Other:Text Message
—
1 April 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
—
12 March 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Other
Other:Text Message
—
11 March 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone;Other:Text Message
—
11 February 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Other
Other:Text Message
—
29 January 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
—
21 January 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
—
20 January 2025Development Review Division—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
—
28 May 2024Ward 11 University-RosedaleDianne Saxe
Member of council
Dianne SaxeEmail
E-mail;Other:Text message
—
27 May 2024Office of Councillor Dianne Saxe (Ward 11)Andrew Greene
Councillor staff
Dianne SaxeEmail
E-mail
—
26 May 2024Ward 11 University-RosedaleDianne Saxe
Member of council
Dianne SaxeCall
Telephone;Other:Text message
—
23 May 2024Ward 11 University-RosedaleDianne Saxe
Member of council
Dianne SaxeOther
Other:Text message
—
14 May 2024Office of Councillor Parthi Kandavel (Ward 20)Ariella Barmash
Councillor staff
Parthi KandavelMeeting—
14 May 2024Office of Councillor Parthi Kandavel (Ward 20)Alexandra Kyriakos
Councillor staff
Parthi KandavelMeeting—
14 May 2024Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestParthi Kandavel
Member of council
Parthi KandavelMeeting—
13 May 2024Office of Councillor Parthi Kandavel (Ward 20)Tasneem Tahrin
Councillor staff
Parthi KandavelEmail
E-mail
—
9 May 2024Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestParthi Kandavel
Member of council
Parthi KandavelEmail
E-mail
—
9 May 2024Office of Councillor Parthi Kandavel (Ward 20)Tasneem Tahrin
Councillor staff
Parthi KandavelEmail
E-mail
—
9 May 2024Office of Councillor Dianne SaxeJessica Miller
Councillor staff
Dianne SaxeEmail
E-mail
—
9 May 2024Ward 11 University-RosedaleDianne Saxe
Member of council
Dianne SaxeEmail
E-mail
—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

This link is inferred by lobbyTO; the registry does not record which agenda item a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Linked development applications

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.