lobbyTO

Registration SM35335 · in-house

Unifor

Status: active21 February 2024 to 31 December 2026Topic: Planning policy and area studiesSource datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
3
Linked agenda items
4
Published links only
Linked applications
0
Published links only

Who

Client
Unifor
Registrant
Jerry Dias
Type
in-house
Status
active
Dates
Approved 21 February 2024; 21 February 2024 to 31 December 2026
Topic (lobbyTO)
Planning policy and area studies (assigned by a decision model from the registration text)

Subject matter

  • Affordable Housing
  • Economic Development
  • Planning and Development

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Lobbying for a housing policy that furthers the goal of addressing availability and affordability of housing while supporting employment and employment lands in the City of Toronto”.

Automated summary of the registration text

Lobbying for a housing policy that furthers the goal of addressing availability and affordability of housing while supporting employment and employment lands in the City of Toronto

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2024-03 to 2024-03

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Olivia ChowMember of council1128 March 2024
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
28 March 2024MayorOlivia Chow
Member of council
Olivia ChowMeetingRoxanne Dubois

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

This link is inferred by lobbyTO; the registry does not record which agenda item a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Linked development applications

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.