100 Thorncliffe Park Drive - Development Charges Complaint

Motions and results

• Amend Item 24 July 2024

  Carried, 21-1
  • Yes2184%
  • No14%
  • Absent312%

  Majority required - EX16.7 - Carroll - motion 1

Source: Members of Council voting record.

How members voted, and who was contacted

Contacted share by vote: 3 of 21 (14%) of Yes votes, 0 of 1 (0%) of No votes. 90-day window. Ward councillors and committee members are flagged below because they are contacted on local and committee matters by default.

• Yes No Absent
• ● Member contacted
• ◐ Staff contacted
• ○ Not contacted
• W Ward councillor
• C Committee member
• B Voted differently from bloc
• $ Funded by a linked contributor of an organisation lobbying on this item

• Olivia ChowMayor
  Yes◐ Staff contacted2 contacts
  C Committee member
• John ToryMayor
  No vote recorded○ Not contacted
• Vincent CrisantiWard 1
  Absent○ Not contacted
• Stephen HolydayWard 2
  No○ Not contacted
• Amber MorleyWard 3
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Gord PerksWard 4
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Frances NunziataWard 5
  Yes○ Not contacted
• James PasternakWard 6
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Anthony PerruzzaWard 7
  Yes○ Not contacted
• Mike ColleWard 8
  Absent○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Alejandra BravoWard 9
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Ausma MalikWard 10
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Dianne SaxeWard 11
  Absent○ Not contacted
• Josh MatlowWard 12
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Chris MoiseWard 13
  Yes○ Not contacted
• Paula FletcherWard 14
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Rachel Chernos LinWard 15
  No vote recorded○ Not contacted
• Jaye RobinsonWard 15
  No vote recorded○ Not contacted
• Jon BurnsideWard 16
  Yes○ Not contacted
• Shelley CarrollWard 17
  Yes◐ Staff contacted1 contact
  C Committee member
• Lily ChengWard 18
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Brad BradfordWard 19
  Yes● Member contacted; Staff contacted2 contacts
  C Committee member
• Gary CrawfordWard 20
  No vote recorded○ Not contacted
• Parthi KandavelWard 20
  Yes○ Not contacted
• Michael ThompsonWard 21
  Yes○ Not contacted
• Nick MantasWard 22
  Yes○ Not contacted
• Jamaal MyersWard 23
  Yes○ Not contacted
• Paul AinslieWard 24
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Jennifer McKelvieWard 25
  Yes○ Not contacted
  C Committee member
• Neethan ShanWard 25
  No vote recorded○ Not contacted

Contact status uses the 90-day window. Vote shown is the vote on the deciding motion.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact (persuadable members, ward councillors, committee members), so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Linked lobbying registrations

This link is inferred by lobbyTO; the registry does not record which agenda item a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

• Heritage Funeral Centre · registration SM34168 · 8 February 2023 to 31 December 2024

  • Economic Development
  • Planning and Development
  Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89

  A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.

  Source records

  • Registration SM34168: Planning options at 100 Thorncliffe Park Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Agenda item 2024.EX16.7: 100 Thorncliffe Park Drive - Development Charges Complaint (TMMIS)

  Matched text

  • particulars: shared address 100 THORNCLIFFE PK

• Greater Toronto Apartment Association · registration SM33082 · 17 March 2022 to 30 June 2025

  • Planning and Development
  Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86

  A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.

  Source records

  • Registration SM33082: development charges, parkland dedication and community benefits charges collectively referred to city staff as growth related charges are being updated and/or introduced. these combined high fees have resulted in few new rental housing developments (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Agenda item 2024.EX16.7: 100 Thorncliffe Park Drive - Development Charges Complaint (TMMIS)

  No further evidence was recorded for this link.

• Deltera Inc. · registration SM26090 · 17 April 2018 to 31 December 2026

  • Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study
  Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75

  A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.

  Source records

  • Registration SM26090: Development Charges (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Agenda item 2024.EX16.7: 100 Thorncliffe Park Drive - Development Charges Complaint (TMMIS)

  No further evidence was recorded for this link.

Window: 180 days before the first recorded vote (26 January 2024 to 24 July 2024). 30 communications on 2 linked registrations.

Declared interests

No declared interests are recorded for this item.

Source: City of Toronto registry of declared interest.