Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 26 112878 NNY 15 OZ

Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos LinDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 4 February 2026; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 10; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 2450 Bayview Ave; 2452 Bayview Ave
Ward: Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted: 4 February 2026
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 141 units; 14,857 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

OPA and Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes the development of a 7-storey retirement residence. The building would provide a total of 141 residential units, being a mix of independent living, assisted living, and memory care units. A private driveway access from Bayview Ave along the southern property line would be provided, leading to 1 level of below-grade parking, providing a total of 54 parking spaces; as well as 13 bicycle parking spaces. The proposed development provides a total GFA of 14,857.04 square metres and a FSI of 2.69. Additionally, the proposed development provides 1,515.65 square metres of indoor amenity space and 1,063.68 square metres of outdoor amenity space.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Reichmann International Realty · registration SM37103
2450-2452 Bayview Avenue - ZBA and SPA
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM37103: 2450-2452 Bayview Avenue - ZBA and SPA (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 26 112878 NNY 15 OZ at 2452 Bayview Ave: OPA and Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes the development of a 7-storey retirement residence. The building would provide a total of 141 residential units, being a mix of independent living, assisted living, and memory care units. A private driveway access from Bayview Ave along the south… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2450-2452 Bayview Avenue - ZBA and SPA
Matched fields
address
2450-2452 BAYVIEW AVE
application_address
2450 BAYVIEW AVE
Reichmann International Realty · registration SM37095
ZBA & SPA 2450 & 2452 Bayview Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM37095: ZBA & SPA 2450 & 2452 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 26 112878 NNY 15 OZ at 2452 Bayview Ave: OPA and Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes the development of a 7-storey retirement residence. The building would provide a total of 141 residential units, being a mix of independent living, assisted living, and memory care units. A private driveway access from Bayview Ave along the south… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA & SPA 2450 & 2452 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
address
2450&2452 BAYVIEW AVE
application_address
2450 BAYVIEW AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 10 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Rachel Chernos Lin	Councillor staff	9	2	19 January 2026
Rachel Chernos Lin	Member of council	1	0	19 January 2026

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15

20 lobbied · 36 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=5

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15: 20 lobbied and 36 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	20	—	100% (n=2)	0%	10%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	36	—	100% (n=5)	0%	25%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.