lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 22 198104 STE 04 SA

340 Dufferin St

Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
31 August 2022
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
5
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
41
5 meetings · 16 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
340 Dufferin St
Ward
Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Submitted
31 August 2022
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
768 units
Related file
22 198105 STE 04 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for a mixed-use development consisting of three buildings at 9, 26 and 29 storeys and incorporating portions of the existing buildings. The development consists of a total of 768 residential units with 46,713.05 sqm residential space, 1,964.5 sqm of Commercial/Flex space and 495sqm of flex space. A community garden/greenhouse and internal courtyard to provide a mid-block connection is proposed. There are 208 underground parking spaces, and 868 bicycle parking spaces proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

5 linked registrations · 41 communications · 5 meetings · 16 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 23 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Alejandra BravoCouncillor staff6022 March 2023
Chris MoiseCouncillor staff406 October 2023
Ward 4 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council3223 August 2022
Alejandra BravoMember of council3016 March 2023
Stephen HolydayCouncillor staff3021 December 2022
Office of Councillor Ana Bailao (Ward 9)Councillor staff2019 October 2022
Brad BradfordMember of council209 January 2023
Dianne SaxeMember of council2128 March 2023
Gord PerksMember of council2019 May 2026
Development ReviewCity staff104 March 2025
Development Review DivisionCity staff105 March 2025
Engineering and Construction ServicesCity staff1020 July 2023
Office of Councillor Perks, Ward 4Councillor staff1020 July 2021
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council1131 October 2022
Chris MoiseMember of council1018 January 2023
Dianne SaxeCouncillor staff1128 March 2023
Gord PerksCouncillor staff1019 May 2026
Lily ChengCouncillor staff1021 February 2023
Lily ChengMember of council1021 February 2023
Mike ColleCouncillor staff105 October 2023
Paula FletcherCouncillor staff1010 February 2023
Paula FletcherMember of council1018 January 2023
Stephen HolydayMember of council109 December 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4

17 lobbied · 33 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4: 17 lobbied and 33 matched unlobbied applications in 13 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied17Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied33Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.