Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 139974 WET 02 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 596 Renforth Dr
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 21 192018 WET 02 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval - Proposed new residential development comprising of 140 3-storey stacked townhouse units, grouped in five parallel blocks.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Vogue Wycliffe (Renforth) Ltd · registration SM34523
Development approvals for 596 Renforth Drive, Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Approval
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34523: Development approvals for 596 Renforth Drive, Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Approval (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 139974 WET 02 SA at 596 Renforth Dr: Site Plan Approval - Proposed new residential development comprising of 140 3-storey stacked townhouse units, grouped in five parallel blocks. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development approvals for 596 Renforth Drive, Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Approval
Matched fields
- address
- 596 RENFORTH DR
- application_address
- 596 RENFORTH DR
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Holyday | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 8 June 2023 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Vogue Wycliffe (Renforth) LtdSM36620 · 13 May 2025 · “596 Renforth Drive.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2
5 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.