lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 22 139883 WET 03 SA

4 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 6 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 8 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 10 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 14 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 16 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 4916 A-4944 A Dundas St W; 4916 Dundas St W; 4916-4944 Dundas St W; 4916A Dundas St W; 4918 Dundas St W; 4920 Dundas St W; 4922 Dundas St W; 4924 Dundas St W; 4928 Dundas St W; 4942 Dundas St W; 4944A Dundas St W; 4944B Dundas St W; 4946 Dundas St W

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
29 April 2022
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
3
0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
4 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 6 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 8 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 10 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 14 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 16 Burnhamthorpe Rd; 4916 A-4944 A Dundas St W; 4916 Dundas St W; 4916-4944 Dundas St W; 4916A Dundas St W; 4918 Dundas St W; 4920 Dundas St W; 4922 Dundas St W; 4924 Dundas St W; 4928 Dundas St W; 4942 Dundas St W; 4944A Dundas St W; 4944B Dundas St W; 4946 Dundas St W
Ward
Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted
29 April 2022
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
204 units
Related file
19 264443 WET 03 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control application to permit a nine-storey seniors residence with 204 dwelling units. The heritage building on site is proposed to be preserved and integrated with the development.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 3 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Councillor Mark Grimes3
Data table· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Mark GrimesCouncillor staff301 June 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

24 lobbied · 100 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied70% n=10

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied30%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3: 24 lobbied and 100 matched unlobbied applications in 18 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied24—100% (n=5)0%4%0.25
Matched, unlobbied1001,62970% (n=10)30%4%0.14
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.