lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 22 121988 ESC 20 OZ

708 Kennedy Rd; 712 Kennedy Rd

Ward 20 · Parthi KandavelDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
OMB Approved
Approved
Submitted
11 March 2022
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
3
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
4
1 meeting · 3 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
708 Kennedy Rd; 712 Kennedy Rd
Ward
Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted
11 March 2022
Status
OMB Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes
Size stated in the description
682 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 21 storey residential building along Kennedy Road and a 42 storey residential building to the rear. A total of 682 residential units are proposing, including 98 rental replacement units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

3 linked registrations · 4 communications · 1 meeting · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest2
  • Gary Crawford1
  • Office of Councillor Crawford1
Data table· 3 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council2127 January 2022
Gary CrawfordCouncillor staff107 January 2022
Office of Councillor CrawfordCouncillor staff1027 January 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20

13 lobbied · 19 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20: 13 lobbied and 19 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied13Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied19Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.