Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 20 226957 WET 07 OZ

Ward 7 · Anthony PerruzzaDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 8 December 2020; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 13; 0 meetings · 10 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 41-75 Four Winds Dr
Ward: Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Submitted: 8 December 2020
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 560 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment to permit three buildings of 9, 11 and 32 storeys. The proposed development will provide a total of 43,745 m² (470,867 ft²) of gross floor area, comprised of 42,323 m² (455,561 ft²) of residential area and 1,422 m² (15,306 ft²) of retail/commercial area, resulting with a Floor Space Index of 4.14 across the Subject Lands. The proposal contemplates 560 residential units, including 45 (8%) bachelor units, 329 (59%) one bedroom units, 102 (18%) two bedroom units, and 84 (15%) three bedroom units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Berncray Holdings Ltd · registration SM33229
Approval of Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 41-75 Four Winds Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33229: Approval of Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 41-75 Four Winds Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 226957 WET 07 OZ at 41-75 Four Winds Dr: Zoning By-law Amendment to permit three buildings of 9, 11 and 32 storeys. The proposed development will provide a total of 43,745 m² (470,867 ft²) of gross floor area, comprised of 42,323 m² (455,561 ft²) of residential area and 1,422 m² (15,306 ft²) of retail/commercial area, resulting with a Flo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Approval of Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 41-75 Four Winds Drive
Matched fields
address
41-75 FOUR WINDS DR
application_address
41-75 FOUR WINDS DR

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 13 communications · 0 meetings · 10 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 17 Don Valley North2
Ward 19 Beaches-East York2
Ward 9 Davenport2
Mayor John Tory1
Ward 1 Etobicoke North1
Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre1
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre1
Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt1

Data table· 10 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Last contact
Ward 17 Don Valley North	Member of council	2	13 June 2022
Ward 19 Beaches-East York	Member of council	2	13 June 2022
Ward 9 Davenport	Member of council	2	13 June 2022
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	1	12 May 2022
Ward 1 Etobicoke North	Member of council	1	12 May 2022
Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	1	12 May 2022
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	1	12 May 2022
Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	1	12 May 2022
Ward 24 Scarborough-Guildwood	Member of council	1	12 May 2022
Ward 5 York South-Weston	Member of council	1	12 May 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

PM Strategies Inc1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7

7 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7: 7 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.