Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 20 194180 STE 12 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 16 September 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 276 Merton St; 290 Merton St
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 16 September 2020
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 91 units
- Related file
- 18 172768 STE 22 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
INACTIVE Site Plan application to permit a 13-storey building (49.65 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse). The proposal includes 91 residential units as well as 58 parking spaces (reduced from 92) in a two- level underground parking garage (reduced from 3-levels).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Ewart Angus Homes Inc. · registration SM30815
Proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 276- 290 Merton Street and impacts upon 268 Merton Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30815: Proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 276- 290 Merton Street and impacts upon 268 Merton Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 194180 STE 12 SA at 276 Merton St: INACTIVE Site Plan application to permit a 13-storey building (49.65 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse). The proposal includes 91 residential units as well as 58 parking spaces (reduced from 92) in a two- level underground parking garage (reduced from 3-levels). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 276- 290 Merton Street and impacts upon 268 Merton Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 276-290 MERTON ST
- application_address
- 276 MERTON ST
Rockport Homes Limited · registration SM25236
276 & 290 Merton St
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25236: 276 & 290 Merton St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 194180 STE 12 SA at 276 Merton St: INACTIVE Site Plan application to permit a 13-storey building (49.65 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse). The proposal includes 91 residential units as well as 58 parking spaces (reduced from 92) in a two- level underground parking garage (reduced from 3-levels). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 276 & 290 Merton St
Matched fields
- address
- 276&290 MERTON ST
- application_address
- 276 MERTON ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 11 communications · 9 meetings · 3 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 6 | 6 | 15 March 2018 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 13 January 2020 |
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 16 February 2021 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | 511 | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.