Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 20 122085 STE 11 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 4 March 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 300 Bloor St W; 478 Huron St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 4 March 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 349 units
- Related file
- 17 279303 STE 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Application to permit the redevelopment of the site for a 34-storey (TLAB approved) mixed-use building containing office, retail/café, worship and community, and residential uses (349 dwelling units). The majority of the existing church and the entirety of Pidgeon House would be retained.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Collecdev Markee Limited Partnership · registration SM32718
300 Bloor St. W - Site Plan
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32718: 300 Bloor St. W - Site Plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 122085 STE 11 SA at 300 Bloor St W: Application to permit the redevelopment of the site for a 34-storey (TLAB approved) mixed-use building containing office, retail/café, worship and community, and residential uses (349 dwelling units). The majority of the existing church and the entirety of Pidgeon House would be retained. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 300 Bloor St. W - Site Plan
Matched fields
- address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 3 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 19 October 2023 |
| Dianne Saxe | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 26 October 2023 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Collecdev Inc.SM31280 · 24 February 2021 · “300 Bloor St. W”
- Northrop Development IncorporatedSM27391 · 22 January 2019 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Northrop Developments Inc.SM27377 · 18 January 2019 · “300 Bloor St. W.”
- 300 Bloor West GP Inc.SM26298 · 4 June 2018 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- 300 Bloor West GP Inc.SM26299 · 4 June 2018 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Collecdev Inc.SM25759 · 19 January 2018 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Northrop Development IncorporatedSM25550 · 18 January 2018 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Northrop Development IncorporatedSM25459 · 19 December 2017 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Northrop Development IncorporatedSM25038 · 15 September 2017 · “300 Bloor Street West.”
- Northrop Development IncorporatedSM25034 · 12 September 2017 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Northrop Development IncorporatedSM24685 · 8 June 2017 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Northrup Developments Inc.SM16097 · 28 March 2011 · “300 Bloor Street West”
- Northrup Developments Inc.SM16098 · 28 March 2011 · “300 Bloor Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.