lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 19 244078 STE 11 OZ

141 Bedford Rd; 143 Bedford Rd; 145 Bedford Rd; 287 Davenport Rd

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
1 November 2019
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
12
2 meetings · 4 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
141 Bedford Rd; 143 Bedford Rd; 145 Bedford Rd; 287 Davenport Rd
Ward
Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted
1 November 2019
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
106 units; 300 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application to facilitate the development of a 53.5 metre (15-storey, excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building comprised of 300 square metres of non-residential gross floor area and 106 residential dwelling units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 12 communications · 2 meetings · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Office of Councillor Layton, Ward 114
  • Ward 11 University-Rosedale4
  • Councillor Mike Layton - Ward 113
  • Councillor Layton, Ward 111
Data table· 4 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Office of Councillor Layton, Ward 11Councillor staff407 February 2020
Ward 11 University-RosedaleMember of council4228 April 2020
Councillor Mike Layton - Ward 11Councillor staff3028 April 2020
Councillor Layton, Ward 11Councillor staff1021 February 2020

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied69—100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Matched, unlobbied60—100% (n=4)0%11%0.03
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.