lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 208789 NNY 24 OZ

630 Sheppard Ave E; 2901 Bayview Ave

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
31 July 2017
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
77
43 meetings · 11 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
630 Sheppard Ave E; 2901 Bayview Ave
Ward
Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
Submitted
31 July 2017
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Bayview Village development including two development sites (North and South). The North site is located at Bayview Mews and Hawksbury Drive, and is proposed to include one 20-storey mixed use building; two 6-storey mixed use buildings; and a retail addition to the existing Bayview Village Shopping Centre. The south site includes a mixed use building fronting onto Sheppard Avenue East with two towers (30 and 29 storeys); and a five storey parking structure located to the south of the Loblaws building. LPAT Appealed February 9, 2018. See LPAT File No. PL 180148, PL180149, PL180150 on LPAT website for more information

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 77 communications · 43 meetings · 11 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Shelley Carroll28
  • Ward 17 Don Valley North17
  • Ward 24 Willowdale9
  • Shelley Carroll8
  • Councillor Shelley Carroll4
  • Councillor Carroll, Ward 172
  • Councillor Carroll, ward 172
  • Councillor Shiner, Ward 242
Data table· 12 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Shelley CarrollCouncillor staff28711 February 2026
Ward 17 Don Valley NorthMember of council171718 May 2022
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council9613 November 2018
Shelley CarrollMember of council8426 August 2024
Councillor Shelley CarrollCouncillor staff4418 May 2022
Councillor Carroll, Ward 17Councillor staff2013 May 2019
Councillor Carroll, ward 17Councillor staff2013 May 2019
Councillor Shiner, Ward 24Councillor staff2212 July 2017
Shelley CarrollCouncillor staff2225 June 2020
Councilor CarolCouncillor staff1023 April 2025
Shelley CarolCouncillor staff1020 January 2026
Ward 23 WillowdaleMember of council118 January 2018

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17

13 lobbied · 16 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17: 13 lobbied and 16 matched unlobbied applications in 11 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied13Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.