Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 270444 NNY 10 OZ

5 Faywood Blvd; 470 Wilson Ave; 480 Wilson Ave; 490 Wilson Ave; 500 Wilson Ave; 530 Wilson Ave

Ward 6 · James PasternakDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 23 December 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 14; 1 meeting · 4 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 5 Faywood Blvd; 470 Wilson Ave; 480 Wilson Ave; 490 Wilson Ave; 500 Wilson Ave; 530 Wilson Ave
Ward: Ward 6 · James Pasternak
Submitted: 23 December 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 394 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The site includes 470, 490 and 530 Wilson Avenue. It is presently occupied by a four-storey commercial building and two four-storey residential rental buildings that contain a total of 110 rental units. The applicant proposes to demolish a four-storey commercial office building and two four-storey residential rental buildings that contain a total of 110 rental units and is seeking a site-specific zoning by-law amendment to allow a 12-storey condominium building (394 units), a 12-storey rental apartment building (161 units) with rental replacement units. The condominium and apartment buildings will front onto Wilson Avenue. The applicant is not proposing to use the 6.1 metre unopened laneway along the north property line for access to the proposal. The condominium and apartment buildings will include office and retail space at grade along Wilson Avenue. The proposed redevelopment also includes three levels of underground parking with a total of 387 spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

ShipLake Properties Ltd. · registration SM24547
Assisting with the development of 470 Wilson-530 Wilson Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24547: Assisting with the development of 470 Wilson-530 Wilson Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270444 NNY 10 OZ at 470 Wilson Ave: The site includes 470, 490 and 530 Wilson Avenue. It is presently occupied by a four-storey commercial building and two four-storey residential rental buildings that contain a total of 110 rental units. The applicant proposes to demolish a four-storey commercial office building and two four-storey … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 470 Wilson-530 Wilson Avenue
Matched fields
address
530 WILSON AVE
application_address
530 WILSON AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 14 communications · 1 meeting · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor James Pasternak10
Councillor Carroll2
Ward 10 York Centre1
Ward 24 Willowdale1

Data table· 4 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor James Pasternak	Councillor staff	10	0	28 July 2020
Councillor Carroll	Councillor staff	2	0	18 September 2019
Ward 10 York Centre	Member of council	1	0	27 June 2017
Ward 24 Willowdale	Member of council	1	1	24 July 2018

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Collecdev Markee Limited Partnership
SM33021 · 11 March 2022 · “500 Wilson Avenue”
Orfus Realty
SM13868 · 15 December 2009 · “530 Wilson Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6

13 lobbied · 16 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6: 13 lobbied and 16 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.