Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 270154 STE 20 OZ

482 Wellington St W; 488 Wellington St W

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 22 December 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 8; 1 meeting · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 482 Wellington St W; 488 Wellington St W
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 22 December 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

This application has been revised and circulated on a 'Without Prejudice' basis. The site has been consolidated with the adjacent property at 470-474 Wellington Street West (file no. 16 261191 STE 20 OZ). These application have both been appeled to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and a consolidated hearing on both applications has been scheduled for May 13-23, 2019. Please review the most recent set of architectural drawings (submitted Dec. 19, 2018), as opposed to the Dec. 3, 2019 version. The revised submission includes material submitted on Dec. 3rd and Dec. 19th (notwithstanding the request to disregard the Dec. 3rd architectural submission).

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Hullmark Developments Limited · registration SM27931
474 Wellington Street West development application for a new office building. Height, massing and heritage elements of proposed combined development (474-488 Wellington Street West) and related LPAT …
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27931: 474 Wellington Street West development application for a new office building. Height, massing and heritage elements of proposed combined development (474-488 Wellington Street West) and related LPAT appeal. Related economic development matters. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270154 STE 20 OZ at 488 Wellington St W: This application has been revised and circulated on a 'Without Prejudice' basis. The site has been consolidated with the adjacent property at 470-474 Wellington Street West (file no. 16 261191 STE 20 OZ). These application have both been appeled to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and a co… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 474 Wellington Street West development application for a new office building. Height, massing and heritage elements of proposed combined developme…
- particulars: …elopment application for a new office building. Height, massing and heritage elements of proposed combined development (474-488 Wellington Street West) and related LPAT appeal. Related economic development matters.
Matched fields
address
474-488 WELLINGTON ST W
application_address
488 WELLINGTON ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 8 communications · 1 meeting · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York4
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York3
Ward 19 Beaches-East York1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York	Councillor staff	4	0	16 April 2019
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York	Member of council	3	1	31 May 2021
Ward 19 Beaches-East York	Member of council	1	0	28 March 2019

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	10%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=7)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.