Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 168925 WET 06 OZ
2 Audley St; 8 Newcastle St; 10 Audley St; 29 Portland St; 59 Portland St; 71 Portland St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 6 June 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2 Audley St; 8 Newcastle St; 10 Audley St; 29 Portland St; 59 Portland St; 71 Portland St
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 6 June 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 1,824 units; 123,653 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit a phased multi-block mixed use development consisting of five residential apartment buildings having a total of 123,653 m2 of gross floor area, of which 952 m2 would be for non-residential uses. The proposed buildings would range in height from 6 to 8-storeys along Portland Street; 12-storeys located internal to the subject site, along Audley Street and along the southern property line; and have tall buildings with heights of 16, 23, 25 and 32-storeys oriented towards the southern portion of the lands. The development would contain approximately 1,824 residential units and a total of 1,049 vehicular parking spaces and 1,278 bicycle parking spaces. NOTE: The first submission was deemed incomplete on June 30, 2016. This second submission is an attempt to complete the first submission. Please note the new STAR Circulation Response date for this circulation package.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Freed Grand Park Developments Inc. · registration SM26301
Proposal for official plan and zoning by-law amendments to redevelop the properties at: (a) 1 Audley Street; and, (b) 2 and 10 Audley Street, 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street and 8 Newcastle Street,…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26301: Proposal for official plan and zoning by-law amendments to redevelop the properties at: (a) 1 Audley Street; and, (b) 2 and 10 Audley Street, 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street and 8 Newcastle Street, with high rise mixed-use buildings. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 168925 WET 06 OZ at 71 Portland St: This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit a phased multi-block mixed use development consisting of five residential apartment buildings having a total of 123,653 m2 of gross floor area, of which 952 m2 would be for non-residential uses. The proposed buildings… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposal for official plan and zoning by-law amendments to redevelop the properties at: (a) 1 Audley Street; and, (b) 2 and 10 Audley Street, 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street and 8 Newcastle Street, with high rise mixed-use bu…
- particulars: …osal for official plan and zoning by-law amendments to redevelop the properties at: (a) 1 Audley Street; and, (b) 2 and 10 Audley Street, 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street and 8 Newcastle Street, with high rise mixed-use buildings.
Matched fields
- address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
- application_address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Minto (Mimico) Inc.SM35829 · 7 August 2024 · “8 Newcastle St”
- Minto (Mimico) Inc.SM35724 · 3 July 2024 · “10 Audley Street”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM35014 · 13 November 2023 · “8 Newcastle Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 19% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.