Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 14 208729 STE 27 OZ

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 19 August 2014; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 11; 3 meetings · 4 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 10 St Mary St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 19 August 2014
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

To rezone the subject lands to develop a 51-storey residential tower at 10 St Mary Street and 79- 85 St. Nicholas Street. The designed heritage building and office space at 10 St. Mary Street is proposed to be retained. The applicant is proposing to demolish the listed building at 79 St. Nicholas Street.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lifetime Developments · registration SM19888
10 St. Mary Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19888: 10 St. Mary Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 208729 STE 27 OZ at 10 St Mary St: To rezone the subject lands to develop a 51-storey residential tower at 10 St Mary Street and 79- 85 St. Nicholas Street. The designed heritage building and office space at 10 St. Mary Street is proposed to be retained. The applicant is proposing to demolish the listed building at 79 St. Nicholas S… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 10 St. Mary Street
Matched fields
address
10 ST MARY ST
application_address
10 ST MARY ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 11 communications · 3 meetings · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale5
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale2
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre2
Ward 24 Willowdale1
Ward 34 Don Valley East1

Data table· 5 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	5	2	13 January 2015
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Councillor staff	2	1	27 October 2015
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	2	0	27 May 2016
Ward 24 Willowdale	Member of council	1	0	4 May 2016
Ward 34 Don Valley East	Member of council	1	0	5 May 2016

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Sherman Brown Dryer Karol1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Newpoint Developments Inc.
SM27144 · 11 December 2018 · “10 St. Mary Street”
RFT Holdings Corp.
SM27145 · 11 December 2018 · “10 St. Mary St.”
Newpoint Developments Inc.
SM23334 · 11 July 2016 · “10 St. Mary Street”
Newpoint Developments Inc.
SM23318 · 6 July 2016 · “10 St. Mary Street”
Lifetime St. Mary Street Inc
SM23045 · 26 April 2016 · “10 St. Mary Street.”
Lifetime Developments
SM19992 · 1 January 2014 · “10 St. Mary Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

83 lobbied · 97 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=10
Matched, unlobbied93% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied17%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 83 lobbied and 97 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	83	—	100% (n=10)	0%	11%	0.14
Matched, unlobbied	97	1,793	93% (n=14)	7%	17%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.