Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 13 123068 NNY 25 OZ

1 Strathgowan Ave; 15 Strathgowan Ave; 17 Strathgowan Ave; 19 Strathgowan Ave; 21 Strathgowan Ave; 2775 Yonge St; 2779 Yonge St; 2781 Yonge St

Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos LinDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 21 February 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Strathgowan Ave; 15 Strathgowan Ave; 17 Strathgowan Ave; 19 Strathgowan Ave; 21 Strathgowan Ave; 2775 Yonge St; 2779 Yonge St; 2781 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted: 21 February 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Revised rezoning application to redevelop the lands with a new mixed use building10 storeys 31.75 m145 residential units of which 28 are rental replacement unitsretail at grade164 parking spaces in 3 levels of underground parking

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Bianca Pollak · registration SM19771
2779 Yonge St
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19771: 2779 Yonge St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123068 NNY 25 OZ at 2779 Yonge St: Revised rezoning application to redevelop the lands with a new mixed use building10 storeys 31.75 m145 residential units of which 28 are rental replacement unitsretail at grade164 parking spaces in 3 levels of underground parking (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2779 Yonge St
Matched fields
address
2779 YONGE ST
application_address
2779 YONGE ST
Pollak Design · registration SM18645
ZBA application re proposed redevelopment of: 2779 & 2781 Yonge St and 15-17 & 19-21 Strathgowan Ave
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18645: ZBA application re proposed redevelopment of: 2779 & 2781 Yonge St and 15-17 & 19-21 Strathgowan Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123068 NNY 25 OZ at 2779 Yonge St: Revised rezoning application to redevelop the lands with a new mixed use building10 storeys 31.75 m145 residential units of which 28 are rental replacement unitsretail at grade164 parking spaces in 3 levels of underground parking (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA application re proposed redevelopment of: 2779 & 2781 Yonge St and 15-17 & 19-21 Strathgowan Ave
Matched fields
address
2779&2781 YONGE ST
application_address
2779 YONGE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 25 Don Valley West1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 25 Don Valley West	Member of council	1	1	2 November 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

stephen g mclaughlin1 registration
Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Devron (YS) Ltd.
SM34751 · 25 August 2023 · “2781 Yonge St.”
Devron (YS) Ltd.
SM30563 · 16 September 2020 · “2779 Yonge Street”
Devron (YS) Ltd.
SM24937 · 10 August 2017 · “2781 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15

20 lobbied · 36 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=5

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15: 20 lobbied and 36 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	20	—	100% (n=2)	0%	10%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	36	—	100% (n=5)	0%	25%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.