Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 255414 WET 03 OZ

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 28 September 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 5; 5 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 2 Holiday Drive
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 28 September 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposed development of townhouse units with underground parking. The townhouse units will be constructed in a variety of forms including stacked townhouses and back to back units arranged in 13 blocks with a central common amenity area.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Menkes Developments Ltd · registration SM18524
2 Holiday Drive, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18524: 2 Holiday Drive, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 255414 WET 03 OZ at 2 Holiday Dr: Proposed development of townhouse units with underground parking. The townhouse units will be constructed in a variety of forms including stacked townhouses and back to back units arranged in 13 blocks with a central common amenity area. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2 Holiday Drive, Toronto
Matched fields
address
2 HOLIDAY DR
application_address
2 HOLIDAY DR
Menkes Developments Ltd · registration SM18471
2 Holiday Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18471: 2 Holiday Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 255414 WET 03 OZ at 2 Holiday Dr: Proposed development of townhouse units with underground parking. The townhouse units will be constructed in a variety of forms including stacked townhouses and back to back units arranged in 13 blocks with a central common amenity area. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2 Holiday Drive
Matched fields
address
2 HOLIDAY DR
application_address
2 HOLIDAY DR

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 5 communications · 5 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre5

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	5	5	17 October 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Sherman Brown Dryer Karol1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.