Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 12 144955 WET 13 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 28 March 2012
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1990 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Submitted
- 28 March 2012
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed amendment to Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the development of a 11 storey mixed use building
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
North Drive Investments Inc. · registration SM19612
1990 Bloor Street West -- Rezoning Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19612: 1990 Bloor Street West -- Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 144955 WET 13 OZ at 1990 Bloor St W: Proposed amendment to Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the development of a 11 storey mixed use building (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1990 Bloor Street West -- Rezoning Application
Matched fields
- address
- 1990 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1990 BLOOR ST W
North Drive Investments Inc. · registration SM17453
My company is seeking to rezone and an official plan amendemnt (if necessary) for a land assembly including two adjacent parcels: 1990 Bloor Street West and 26 Parkview Gardens. We are seeking to pro…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17453: My company is seeking to rezone and an official plan amendemnt (if necessary) for a land assembly including two adjacent parcels: 1990 Bloor Street West and 26 Parkview Gardens. We are seeking to propose a new condominium with full rental replacement. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 144955 WET 13 OZ at 1990 Bloor St W: Proposed amendment to Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the development of a 11 storey mixed use building (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: … is seeking to rezone and an official plan amendemnt (if necessary) for a land assembly including two adjacent parcels: 1990 Bloor Street West and 26 Parkview Gardens. We are seeking to propose a new condominium with full rental replacement.
Matched fields
- address
- 1990 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1990 BLOOR ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 12 communications · 5 meetings · 4 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 8 | 2 | 12 December 2014 |
| Deputy City Manager | City staff | 2 | 2 | 6 September 2013 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 6 September 2013 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 23 April 2012 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- North Drive Investments Inc.SM17485 · 24 November 2011 · “1990 Bloor St. W.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.