Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 11 330258 NNY 16 SA

375 Fairlawn Ave; 377 Fairlawn Ave; 412 Brookdale Ave; 414 Brookdale Ave; 416 X Brookdale Ave; 1678 Avenue Rd; 1682 Avenue Rd; 1686 Avenue Rd; 1688 Avenue Rd; 1690 Avenue Rd; 1694 Avenue Rd; 1696 Avenue Rd; 1698 Avenue Rd; 1702 Avenue Rd; 1704 Avenue Rd

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 22 December 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 375 Fairlawn Ave; 377 Fairlawn Ave; 412 Brookdale Ave; 414 Brookdale Ave; 416 X Brookdale Ave; 1678 Avenue Rd; 1682 Avenue Rd; 1686 Avenue Rd; 1688 Avenue Rd; 1690 Avenue Rd; 1694 Avenue Rd; 1696 Avenue Rd; 1698 Avenue Rd; 1702 Avenue Rd; 1704 Avenue Rd
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 22 December 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 80 units
Related file: 11 330290 NNY 16 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

A 7-storey mixed-use building with at grade retail. Total of 80 units which includes onsite replacement of 18 residential rental units. 191 parking spaces within 2 below grade parking levels consisting of 108 for residential uses; 70 commercial spaces & 13 visitor spaces. 50 bicycle also provided. Access to the site is via 2 driveways: from Brookdale Avenue and Fairlawn Avenue. Linked with Rezoning and Rental Demolition applications at 375, 377 Fairlawn Avenue and 412, 414, 416 Brookdale Avenue.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Mady Development Corporation · registration SM18120
Zoning application for 1678-1704 Avenue Road, and 412-416 Brookdale Avenue. The application is to permit a 7 storey mixed use condominium development with a rental housing component.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18120: Zoning application for 1678-1704 Avenue Road, and 412-416 Brookdale Avenue. The application is to permit a 7 storey mixed use condominium development with a rental housing component. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 330258 NNY 16 SA at 1678 Avenue Rd: A 7-storey mixed-use building with at grade retail. Total of 80 units which includes onsite replacement of 18 residential rental units. 191 parking spaces within 2 below grade parking levels consisting of 108 for residential uses; 70 commercial spaces & 13 visitor spaces. 50 bicycle also provided. … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning application for 1678-1704 Avenue Road, and 412-416 Brookdale Avenue. The application is to permit a 7 storey mixed use condominium development with a rental …
Matched fields
address
1678-1704 AVENUE RD
application_address
1678 AVENUE RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Empire Communities (1704 Avenue Rd)
SM27693 · 20 February 2019 · “1704 Avenue Rd.”
Mady Development Corporation
SM14360 · 27 April 2010 · “1678 Avenue Road”
Mady Development Corporation
SM14245 · 18 March 2010 · “1678 Avenue Road”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 70 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied8%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 70 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	25	—	100% (n=3)	0%	8%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	70	727	100% (n=4)	0%	4%	0.00

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.