Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 11 278098 STE 28 SB
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 September 2011
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 261 Queens Quay E
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 20 September 2011
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 11 278118 STE 28 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Create Plan of subdivision for East Bayfront -Bayside lands (Phases 1 & 2) to create 8 construction Blocks, 2 promenade Blocks and for the creation of the public roadway network (14 blocks in total on the draft plan of subdivision).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc. · registration SM20266
261 Queens Quay East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 278098 STE 28 SB at 261 Queens Quay E: Create Plan of subdivision for East Bayfront -Bayside lands (Phases 1 & 2) to create 8 construction Blocks, 2 promenade Blocks and for the creation of the public roadway network (14 blocks in total on the draft plan of subdivision). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 8 April 2014 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.SM20267 · 8 April 2014 · “261 Queens Quay East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.