Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 11 248849 STE 32 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 July 2011
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 715 Kingston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Submitted
- 29 July 2011
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 8 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Site plan approval application to construct new 3 storey + mezzanine residential building with 8 residential units - 8 parking spaces with an additional 2 parking spaces for visitors - at grade parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
715 Kingston Developments Inc. · registration SM17748
715 Kingston Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17748: 715 Kingston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 248849 STE 32 SA at 715 Kingston Rd: Site plan approval application to construct new 3 storey + mezzanine residential building with 8 residential units - 8 parking spaces with an additional 2 parking spaces for visitors - at grade parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 715 Kingston Road
Matched fields
- address
- 715 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 715 KINGSTON RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 715 Kingston Developments Inc.SM17694 · 13 January 2012 · “715 Kingston Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19
6 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.