lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 10 314966 STE 22 OZ

99 Foxbar Rd; 101 Foxbar Rd; 129 St Clair Ave W

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
15 December 2010
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
13
11 meetings · 5 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
99 Foxbar Rd; 101 Foxbar Rd; 129 St Clair Ave W
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
15 December 2010
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
220 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application to alter the existing heritage church with non-residential uses and a publicly accessible couryard; and construct a new 27 storey residential tower with six 3-storey town house units at rear. A total of 220 residential dwellings units, 241 parking spaces in 3 levels below grade parking and 172 bicycle parking spaces are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 13 communications · 11 meetings · 5 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 22 St. Paul's8
  • Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina2
  • Office of Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 221
  • Ward 21 St. Paul's1
  • Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1
Data table· 5 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 22 St. Paul'sMember of council879 February 2012
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council229 February 2012
Office of Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22Councillor staff109 February 2012
Ward 21 St. Paul'sMember of council119 February 2012
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council1130 January 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied44—100% (n=9)0%14%0.02
Matched, unlobbied60—100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.