Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 10 105227 NNY 15 OZ

1100 Caledonia Rd; 1120 Caledonia Rd; 1120-1130 Caledonia Rd; 1130 Caledonia Rd; 1150 Caledonia Rd

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 15 January 2010; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 7; 5 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1100 Caledonia Rd; 1120 Caledonia Rd; 1120-1130 Caledonia Rd; 1130 Caledonia Rd; 1150 Caledonia Rd
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 15 January 2010
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 10,085 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Application to permit 31, 613 m2 of retail and office uses in 3 existing buildings with additions to Building A and C for a total of 10,085 m2 of new GFA..

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Herefordshire Capital Corporation · registration SM15844
1100 - 1150 Caledonia Road Re-use of three existing industrial commercial buildings for commercial purposes
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15844: 1100 - 1150 Caledonia Road Re-use of three existing industrial commercial buildings for commercial purposes (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 105227 NNY 15 OZ at 1100 Caledonia Rd: Application to permit 31, 613 m2 of retail and office uses in 3 existing buildings with additions to Building A and C for a total of 10,085 m2 of new GFA.. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1100 - 1150 Caledonia Road Re-use of three existing industrial commercial buildings for commercial purposes
Matched fields
address
1100-1150 CALEDONIA RD
application_address
1100 CALEDONIA RD
Excel Development Corporation · registration SM15386
Development approval application regarding 1100 - 1150 Caledonia Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15386: Development approval application regarding 1100 - 1150 Caledonia Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 105227 NNY 15 OZ at 1100 Caledonia Rd: Application to permit 31, 613 m2 of retail and office uses in 3 existing buildings with additions to Building A and C for a total of 10,085 m2 of new GFA.. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development approval application regarding 1100 - 1150 Caledonia Road
Matched fields
address
1100-1150 CALEDONIA RD
application_address
1100 CALEDONIA RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 5 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence5
Ward 12 York South-Weston2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	5	4	13 May 2016
Ward 12 York South-Weston	Member of council	2	1	11 January 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration
Aird & Berlis LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

OPGI Management GP Inc.
SM34668 · 26 July 2023 · “1150 Caledonia Rd”
Oxford Properties Group
SM34591 · 26 June 2023 · “1150 Caledonia Rd”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=2)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	27%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.