lobbyTO

Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

462 Wellington St W

Registrations naming this address
11
3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
90
16 offices contacted
Applications at this address
3
11 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location
43.64362, -79.39776
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

11

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Top 8

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ausma Malik33
  • Councillor Joe Mihevc13
  • Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York13
  • Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 108
  • Ausma Malik5
  • Joe Cressy3
  • Development Review2
  • Legal Services2
Data table· 16 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ausma MalikCouncillor staff3383 September 2025
Councillor Joe MihevcCouncillor staff13631 August 2022
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort YorkMember of council13927 October 2022
Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 10Councillor staff8319 June 2019
Ausma MalikMember of council5325 August 2025
Joe CressyCouncillor staff3312 April 2022
Development ReviewCity staff2022 May 2026
Legal ServicesCity staff204 April 2025
Toronto WaterCity staff208 May 2019
Councillor Joe CressyCouncillor staff2112 April 2022
Vincent CrisantiMember of council226 October 2025
Development & Growth ServicesCity staff108 June 2026
Finance & Treasury ServicesCity staff108 June 2026
Parks, Forestry & RecreationCity staff1020 June 2024
Parks, Forestry & RecreationCity staff1020 June 2024
Ausma MalikCouncillor staff1030 December 2021
All registrations· 11 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM37658Verve Senior Living462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Real Estate / Proper…19 May 2026 – 18 May 20274
SM36756Verve Senior Living462 Wellington Street W.Planning and Development Application27 June 2025 – 19 December 20261
SM36757Verve Senior Living462 Wellington St WPlanning and Development; Seniors27 June 2025 – 10 December 20251
SM36505Verve Senior Living462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application; Seniors3 April 2025 – 19 December 20252
SM36289Verve Senior Living462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application; Seniors24 January 2025 – 31 December 20263
SM34822DCMS Realty Developments Inc.462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Site Plan; Seniors19 September 2023 – 19 December 202617
SM34312DCMS Realty Developments Inc.462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Site Plan; Seniors14 March 2023 – 1 September 20232
SM31695DCMS Realty Developments Inc.462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Site Plan; Seniors14 May 2021 – 15 March 202327
SM28156DCMS Realty Developments Inc.462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Site Plan; Seniors8 May 2019 – 26 March 20251
SM27891462 Wellington Inc.462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law20 March 2019 – 16 July 20191
SM27909462 Wellington Inc.462 Wellington Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla…20 March 2019 – 26 February 202531

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

3
Data table· 3 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
A0997/24TEY
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)12 November 2024Closed
Approved
21 249660 STE 10 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)17 December 2021NOAC Issued
Approved
19 133227 STE 10 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)1 April 2019Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied136
  • Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=20
  • Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied20136100% (n=20)0%0%14%
Matched, unlobbied26113893% (n=214)7%5%18%
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,881

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied66—100% (n=5)0%3%0.05
Matched, unlobbied1651,881100% (n=11)0%2%0.04
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=7
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied11%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied88—100% (n=7)0%11%0.03
Matched, unlobbied94—100% (n=6)0%5%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.