Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
307 Lake Shore Blvd E
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64724, -79.36192
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34222 | Plaza Partners | 307 Lake Shore Blvd. East | Planning and Development Application | 22 February 2023 – 1 February 2024 | 0 |
| SM34129 | Resident | 307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning… | 2 February 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 18 September 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0723/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 4 May 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 141953 STE 10 SAAppeal Received · In progress
- Submitted 4 May 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 141954 STE 10 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0723/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 September 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 22 141953 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 May 2022 | Appeal Received In progress |
| 22 141954 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 May 2022 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
307 Lake Shore Blvd E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 141953 STE 10 SA · submitted 4 May 2022 · Appeal Received · from registration SM34129 (Resident)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34129: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. - Proposed Redevelopment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 141953 STE 10 SA at 307 Lake Shore Blvd E: Proposed Site Plan approval for a 49-storey (155 m) residential tower containing 430 residential units with one level of non-residential potential community space on the second floor at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East. A related application to amend the Official Plan (Central Waterfront Secondary Pla… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. - Proposed Redevelopment
Matched fields
- address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
- application_address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
307 Lake Shore Blvd E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 141954 STE 10 OZ · submitted 4 May 2022 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM34129 (Resident)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34129: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. - Proposed Redevelopment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 141954 STE 10 OZ at 307 Lake Shore Blvd E: Application to amend the Official Plan (Central Waterfront Secondary Plan) and Zoning By-law at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East. The proposal is for a 49-storey (155 m) residential tower containing 430 residential units with one level of non-residential potential community space on the second floor.T… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. - Proposed Redevelopment
Matched fields
- address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
- application_address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
307 Lake Shore Blvd E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 141954 STE 10 OZ · submitted 4 May 2022 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM34222 (Plaza Partners)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34222: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. East, Toronto, (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 141954 STE 10 OZ at 307 Lake Shore Blvd E: Application to amend the Official Plan (Central Waterfront Secondary Plan) and Zoning By-law at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East. The proposal is for a 49-storey (155 m) residential tower containing 430 residential units with one level of non-residential potential community space on the second floor.T… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. East, Toronto,
Matched fields
- address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
- application_address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.