Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
294 Main St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Location
- 43.68765, -79.30197
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 11 March 2026Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 26 128251 STE 19 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 24 February 2026Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 26 120711 STE 19 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 April 2023Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 23 133834 STE 19 PLApproved · Approved
- Submitted 24 February 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 117200 STE 19 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 June 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 190765 STE 32 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 June 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 190775 STE 32 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 128251 STE 19 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 11 March 2026 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 26 120711 STE 19 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 24 February 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 23 133834 STE 19 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 13 April 2023 | Approved Approved |
| 23 117200 STE 19 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 24 February 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 190765 STE 32 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 June 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 190775 STE 32 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 June 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
286 Main St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 190765 STE 32 OZ · submitted 30 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24427 (Tribute Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24427: 286-294 Main Street - Development Applications (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190765 STE 32 OZ at 286 Main St: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate the development of a 30-storey mixed use building, with retail at the ground floor, a floor of office space and 301 residential units above. The existing public laneway is proposed to be widened, and the detached house at 144 Stephenson Avenue is proposed to be… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 286-294 Main Street - Development Applications
Matched fields
- address
- 286-294 MAIN ST
- application_address
- 286 MAIN ST
286 Main St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 190775 STE 32 SA · submitted 30 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24427 (Tribute Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24427: 286-294 Main Street - Development Applications (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190775 STE 32 SA at 286 Main St: Site Plan Approval to facilitate the development of a 27-storey mixed use building, with non-residential space (retail and office) at the ground floor, and 371 residential units above. The existing public laneway is proposed to be widened, and the detached house at 144 Stephenson Avenue is proposed… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 286-294 Main Street - Development Applications
Matched fields
- address
- 286-294 MAIN ST
- application_address
- 286 MAIN ST
286 Main St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 190775 STE 32 SA · submitted 30 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24439 (Tribute Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24439: 286-294 Main Street- Development Applications (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190775 STE 32 SA at 286 Main St: Site Plan Approval to facilitate the development of a 27-storey mixed use building, with non-residential space (retail and office) at the ground floor, and 371 residential units above. The existing public laneway is proposed to be widened, and the detached house at 144 Stephenson Avenue is proposed… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 286-294 Main Street- Development Applications
Matched fields
- address
- 286-294 MAIN ST
- application_address
- 286 MAIN ST
286 Main St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 190775 STE 32 SA · submitted 30 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM30207 (Tribute Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30207: Planning and Development Applications for the properties located at 286-294 Main Street, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190775 STE 32 SA at 286 Main St: Site Plan Approval to facilitate the development of a 27-storey mixed use building, with non-residential space (retail and office) at the ground floor, and 371 residential units above. The existing public laneway is proposed to be widened, and the detached house at 144 Stephenson Avenue is proposed… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Development Applications for the properties located at 286-294 Main Street, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 286-294 MAIN ST
- application_address
- 286 MAIN ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 19
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19
7 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19
6 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.