Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 24 235912 NNY 08 SB
250 Bowie Ave; 670 Caledonia Rd; 680 Caledonia Rd
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 6 November 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 250 Bowie Ave; 670 Caledonia Rd; 680 Caledonia Rd
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 6 November 2024
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 24 242246 NNY 08 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision contains 6 blocks including one street and public park.The file is associated with OPA & Rezoning file 2024 242246 NNY 16 OZ.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM35104 · 4 December 2023 · “250 Bowie Avenue”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM33686 · 21 September 2022 · “250 Bowie Avenue”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM33692 · 21 September 2022 · “250 Bowie Avenue”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM33703 · 21 September 2022 · “250 Bowie Avenue”
- Hullmark Developments LimitedSM32779 · 7 January 2022 · “250 Bowie Avenue”
- HullmarkSM32728 · 21 December 2021 · “250 Bowie Avenue”
- HullmarkSM32729 · 21 December 2021 · “250 Bowie Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.