Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 21 180098 STE 09 CD

Ward 9 · Alejandra BravoDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 6 July 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 19 Innes Ave; 177 Caledonia Road
Ward: Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted: 6 July 2021
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 13 281025 WET 17 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Common Element Condominium application for a private laneway (shown as Part 44 on Draft Plan of Condominium) to provide vehicular access to 41 lots. A pedestrian walkway is proposed between the Park Block and Parcel C, and will also form the common elements for the development. Part Lot Control Exemption application 13 281015 000 00 PL will be reviewed concurrently.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Frontdoor Developments (4700 Bathurst) Inc.
SM36058 · 22 October 2024 · “177 Caledonia Road”
Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc)
SM25308 · 13 November 2017 · “177 Caledonia Road”
Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc)
SM25308 · 13 November 2017 · “19 Innes Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9

2 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9: 2 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.