Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 21 172862 WET 03 SB
8 Newcastle St; 10 Audley St; 29 Portland St; 59 Portland St; 71 Portland St
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 18 June 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 8 Newcastle St; 10 Audley St; 29 Portland St; 59 Portland St; 71 Portland St
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 18 June 2021
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 16 168925 WET 06 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Subdivision in order to establish two mixed use development blocks (Blocks 1 and 2), two park blocks (Block 3 and 4) and a road widening (Block 5) for the extension of Newcastle Street.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Minto (Mimico) Inc.SM35829 · 7 August 2024 · “8 Newcastle St”
- Minto (Mimico) Inc.SM35724 · 3 July 2024 · “10 Audley Street”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM35014 · 13 November 2023 · “8 Newcastle Street”
- Freed Grand Park Developments Inc.SM26301 · 4 June 2018 · “10 Audley Street”
- Freed Grand Park Developments Inc.SM26301 · 4 June 2018 · “71 Portland Street”
- Freed Grand Park Developments Inc.SM26301 · 4 June 2018 · “8 Newcastle Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.