Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 17 278413 STE 18 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 21 December 2017
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 20 Perth Ave; 158 Sterling Rd
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 21 December 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 16 122757 STE 18 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for draft plan of condo related to Block 1 with 32 three-bedroom townhouse units organized within four townhouse blocks and a common driveway. This application is being review concurrently with a Part Lot Control application #17-178429.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM37702 · 8 June 2026 · “20 Perth Avenue”
- Rio Tinto AlcanSM30716 · 14 October 2020 · “158 Sterling Road”
- HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM29038 · 23 October 2019 · “20 Perth Avenue”
- HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM29040 · 23 October 2019 · “20 Perth Avenue”
- HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM27492 · 30 January 2019 · “20 Perth Avenue.”
- HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM27464 · 29 January 2019 · “20 Perth Avenue”
- Castlepoint Studio PartnersSM24465 · 3 May 2017 · “158 Sterling Road”
- Castlepoint Studio PartnersSM18668 · 6 November 2012 · “158 Sterling Road”
- CAW-CanadaSM18571 · 18 October 2012 · “158 Sterling Road”
- Castlepoint Studio Properties LimitedSM16444 · 26 May 2012 · “158 Sterling Road”
- Rio Tinto AlcanSM17739 · 27 January 2012 · “158 Sterling Road”
- Castlepoint Studio PartnersSM17405 · 4 November 2011 · “158 Sterling Road”
- Castlepoint Studio PartnersSM16075 · 21 March 2011 · “158 Sterling Road.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.