Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 15 184877 WET 07 PL
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 3 July 2015
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 115 Torbarrie Rd
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Submitted
- 3 July 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 110 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Part Lot Control application permit the repositioning of lot lines in Block 152 on Plan 66M 2436 to accommodate 110 townhouse units
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Ringley ConstructionSM22430 · 3 November 2015 · “115 Torbarrie Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.