Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 15 180825 NNY 25 OZ
200 Keewatin Ave; 202 Keewatin Ave; 204 Keewatin Ave; 206 Keewatin Ave; 208 Keewatin Ave; 210 Keewatin Ave; 212 Keewatin Ave; 214 Keewatin Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 25 June 2015
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 200 Keewatin Ave; 202 Keewatin Ave; 204 Keewatin Ave; 206 Keewatin Ave; 208 Keewatin Ave; 210 Keewatin Ave; 212 Keewatin Ave; 214 Keewatin Ave
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 25 June 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 80 units; 8,604 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 15 113064 NNY 25 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
The application proposes to amend the official plan to permit two 4-storey stacked townhouse blocks, plus rooftop amenity area, comprised of 80 residential units with a residential gross floor area of 8,604 square metres. Parking is proposed within a one level shared underground garage providing a total of 85 parking spaces, which includes 8 parking spaces dedicated for visitors. Driveway access is located at the west end of the site.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 10% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 25% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.