Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 14 146577 NNY 09 SA
151 William Duncan Rd; 153 William Duncan Rd; 155 William Duncan Rd; 157 William Duncan Rd; 159 William Duncan Rd; 161 William Duncan Rd; 163 William Duncan Rd; 167 William Duncan Rd; 169 William Duncan Rd; 171 William Duncan Rd; 173 William Duncan Rd; 175 William Duncan Rd; 179 William Duncan Rd; 181 William Duncan Rd; 183 William Duncan Rd; 185 William Duncan Rd; 187 William Duncan Rd; 189 William Duncan Rd; 289 Downsview Park Blvd; 291 Downsview Park Blvd; 293 Downsview Park Blvd; 295 Downsview Park Blvd; 297 Downsview Park Blvd; 299 Downsview Park Blvd; 1377 Sheppard Ave W; 2995 Keele St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 24 April 2014
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 151 William Duncan Rd; 153 William Duncan Rd; 155 William Duncan Rd; 157 William Duncan Rd; 159 William Duncan Rd; 161 William Duncan Rd; 163 William Duncan Rd; 167 William Duncan Rd; 169 William Duncan Rd; 171 William Duncan Rd; 173 William Duncan Rd; 175 William Duncan Rd; 179 William Duncan Rd; 181 William Duncan Rd; 183 William Duncan Rd; 185 William Duncan Rd; 187 William Duncan Rd; 189 William Duncan Rd; 289 Downsview Park Blvd; 291 Downsview Park Blvd; 293 Downsview Park Blvd; 295 Downsview Park Blvd; 297 Downsview Park Blvd; 299 Downsview Park Blvd; 1377 Sheppard Ave W; 2995 Keele St
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 24 April 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 163808 NNY 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Application for 138 standard stacked condominium townhouses and 6 freehold common element condominium townbouses with rear lanes
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.