Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 14 121340 NNY 09 SA
2 Sarah Jackson Cres; 2 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 4 Sarah Jackson Cres; 4 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 6 Sarah Jackson Cres; 6 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 8 Sarah Jackson Cres; 8 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 10 Sarah Jackson Cres; 10 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 12 Sarah Jackson Cres; 12 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 14 Sarah Jackson Cres; 16 Sarah Jackson Cres; 18 Sarah Jackson Cres; 22 Sarah Jackson Cres; 24 Sarah Jackson Cres; 26 Sarah Jackson Cres; 28 Sarah Jackson Cres; 30 Sarah Jackson Cres; 32 Sarah Jackson Cres; 32 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 34 Sarah Jackson Cres; 36 Sarah Jackson Cres; 38 Sarah Jackson Cres; 40 Sarah Jackson Cres; 42 Sarah Jackson Cres; 43 Sarah Jackson Cres; 44 Sarah Jackson Cres; 45 Sarah Jackson Cres; 46 Sarah Jackson Cres; 47 Sarah Jackson Cres; 48 Sarah Jackson Cres; 60 Sarah Jackson Cres; 167 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 169 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 170 William Duncan Rd; 171 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 173 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 175 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 177 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 179 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 247 Downsview Park Blvd; 249 Downsview Park Blvd; 251 Downsview Park Blvd; 253 Downsview Park Blvd; 255 Downsview Park Blvd; 257 Downsview Park Blvd; 259 Downsview Park Blvd; 263 Downsview Park Blvd; 265 Downsview Park Blvd; 267 Downsview Park Blvd; 269 Downsview Park Blvd; 271 Downsview Park Blvd; 273 Downsview Park Blvd; 275 Downsview Park Blvd; 277 Downsview Park Blvd; 279 Downsview Park Blvd; 281 Downsview Park Blvd; 283 Downsview Park Blvd; 285 Downsview Park Blvd; 1377 Sheppard Ave W; 2995 Keele St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 25 February 2014
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2 Sarah Jackson Cres; 2 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 4 Sarah Jackson Cres; 4 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 6 Sarah Jackson Cres; 6 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 8 Sarah Jackson Cres; 8 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 10 Sarah Jackson Cres; 10 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 12 Sarah Jackson Cres; 12 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 14 Sarah Jackson Cres; 16 Sarah Jackson Cres; 18 Sarah Jackson Cres; 22 Sarah Jackson Cres; 24 Sarah Jackson Cres; 26 Sarah Jackson Cres; 28 Sarah Jackson Cres; 30 Sarah Jackson Cres; 32 Sarah Jackson Cres; 32 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 34 Sarah Jackson Cres; 36 Sarah Jackson Cres; 38 Sarah Jackson Cres; 40 Sarah Jackson Cres; 42 Sarah Jackson Cres; 43 Sarah Jackson Cres; 44 Sarah Jackson Cres; 45 Sarah Jackson Cres; 46 Sarah Jackson Cres; 47 Sarah Jackson Cres; 48 Sarah Jackson Cres; 60 Sarah Jackson Cres; 167 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 169 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 170 William Duncan Rd; 171 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 173 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 175 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 177 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 179 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 247 Downsview Park Blvd; 249 Downsview Park Blvd; 251 Downsview Park Blvd; 253 Downsview Park Blvd; 255 Downsview Park Blvd; 257 Downsview Park Blvd; 259 Downsview Park Blvd; 263 Downsview Park Blvd; 265 Downsview Park Blvd; 267 Downsview Park Blvd; 269 Downsview Park Blvd; 271 Downsview Park Blvd; 273 Downsview Park Blvd; 275 Downsview Park Blvd; 277 Downsview Park Blvd; 279 Downsview Park Blvd; 281 Downsview Park Blvd; 283 Downsview Park Blvd; 285 Downsview Park Blvd; 1377 Sheppard Ave W; 2995 Keele St
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 25 February 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 163808 NNY 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposal for 60 freehold condominium (common element) townhouses with rear lanes within Blocks B1 & B4 of a draft-approved plan of subdivision (Stanley Greene - 10-252415 NNY08SB).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.