Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 11 253762 NNY 24 SA

630 Sheppard Ave E; 2877 Bayview Ave; 2901 Bayview Ave

Ward 17 · Shelley CarrollDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 9 August 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 630 Sheppard Ave E; 2877 Bayview Ave; 2901 Bayview Ave
Ward: Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
Submitted: 9 August 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Orlando Corporation Bayview Village Mall proposing to construct a new two-storey,1998 square meter free standing retail building at the south side of the site, in place of existing free standing building ( Building B ).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

QuadReal Real Property Group Limited Partnership
SM34672 · 26 July 2023 · “2901 Bayview Avenue.”
QuadReal Real Property Group Limited Partnership
SM24051 · 23 February 2017 · “2901 Bayview Avenue”
Bentall Kennedy
SM22248 · 21 September 2015 · “2901 Bayview Ave”
Orlando Corporation
SM12912 · 7 April 2009 · “2901 Bayview Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17

14 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17: 14 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 11 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	14	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	20	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.