Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 10 289554 NNY 10 OZ
0 Allen Rd; 0 Dufferin St; 0 Home Rd; 0 Keele St; 0 Plewes Rd; 0 Wilson Ave; 30 Tippett Rd; 35 Carl Hall Rd; 50 Wilson Heights Blvd; 64 Murray Rd; 80 Carl Hall Rd; 570 Wilson Ave; 1035 Sheppard Ave W; 1133-1377 Sheppard Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 2 November 2010
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 0 Allen Rd; 0 Dufferin St; 0 Home Rd; 0 Keele St; 0 Plewes Rd; 0 Wilson Ave; 30 Tippett Rd; 35 Carl Hall Rd; 50 Wilson Heights Blvd; 64 Murray Rd; 80 Carl Hall Rd; 570 Wilson Ave; 1035 Sheppard Ave W; 1133-1377 Sheppard Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 2 November 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
OPA submitted by Build Toronto to implement a new Downsview Area Secondary Plan on the same lands subject of the City-initiated Downsview Area Secondary Plan Review. These lands are also subject of an OPA submitted by Parc Downsview Park Inc. to also implement a new Downsview Area Secondary Plan.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Collecdev Inc.SM33340 · 8 June 2022 · “30 Tippett Rd”
- Tippett South Inc.SM26529 · 23 July 2018 · “30 Tippett Road”
- Build Toronto Holdings (Tippett) Inc.SM23319 · 21 June 2016 · “30 Tippett Road”
- Shiplake Management CompanySM22378 · 23 October 2015 · “30 Tippett Road”
- City of TorontoSM17766 · 1 February 2012 · “30 Tippett Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.