Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
774 Marlee Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.71426, -79.44622
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 26 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 138718 NNY 08 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 December 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 251194 NNY 08 OZAppeal Received · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 138718 NNY 08 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 251194 NNY 08 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2021 | Appeal Received In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
774 Marlee Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 138718 NNY 08 SA · submitted 26 April 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33306 (Spotlight Development Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33306: 768-782 Marlee Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 138718 NNY 08 SA at 774 Marlee Ave: Site Plan Approval for a 12 storey residential building containing 301 dwelling units. A total of 19,085 square metres of GFA and 180 parking spaces are proposed. ***There is a related zoning by-law amendment application 21 251194 NNY 08 OZ ***. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 768-782 Marlee Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 768-782 MARLEE AVE
- application_address
- 774 MARLEE AVE
782 Marlee Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 251194 NNY 08 OZ · submitted 23 December 2021 · Appeal Received · from registration SM33306 (Spotlight Development Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33306: 768-782 Marlee Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 251194 NNY 08 OZ at 782 Marlee Ave: Official Plan and Zoning by-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a proposed 24 storey residential building with 60m2 non-residential retail use at grade and containing 321 dwelling units, with 162 vehicular and 289 bicycle parking spaces in a 2-level below grade… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 768-782 Marlee Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 768-782 MARLEE AVE
- application_address
- 782 MARLEE AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 70 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 70 | 727 | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 27% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.