Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
572 Church St.
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66622, -79.38177
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 572A CHURCH ST.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 6 | 6 | 17 July 2018 |
| Councillor Wong-Tam | Councillor staff | 5 | 2 | 11 September 2019 |
| Kristyn Wong-Tam | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 17 July 2018 |
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25458 | Fieldgate Developments | 572 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 19 December 2017 – 7 March 2023 | 1 |
| SM25469 | Fieldgate Homes | 572 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 19 December 2017 – 31 December 2018 | 0 |
| SM25334 | Fieldgate Homes | 572 Church Street. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 16 November 2017 – 15 November 2025 | 3 |
| SM25339 | Fieldgate Homes | 572 Church Street. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 16 November 2017 – 23 March 2018 | 3 |
| SM24968 | Church Welldun Developments Limited | 572 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 August 2017 – 21 August 2023 | 2 |
| SM22615 | Fieldgate Homes | 572 Church St. | Building Permits; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 5 January 2016 – 31 December 2016 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 27 September 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 219198 STE 13 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 235174 STE 13 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 June 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 179441 STE 27 OZAppeal Received · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 219198 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 September 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 235174 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 7 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 17 179441 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 June 2017 | Appeal Received In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
572 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 179441 STE 27 OZ · submitted 13 June 2017 · Appeal Received · from registration SM25458 (Fieldgate Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25458: Applications in support of redevelopment of 572 Church Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 179441 STE 27 OZ at 572 Church St: OPA and Rezoning application to permit a 12-storey mixed-use building (38.5 m plus mechanical penthouse) consisting of 225 square metres of retail uses at grade and 127 dwelling units above. A total of 96 bicycle parking spaces and 20 vehicular parking are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 572 Church Street
Matched fields
- address
- 572 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 572 CHURCH ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.