Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
498 Gilbert Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.69163, -79.46357
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 8 March 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5238826Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 6 September 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0993/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 February 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 112776 STE 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| COA-5238826 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 March 2023 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A0993/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 September 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 22 112776 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 February 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
498 Gilbert Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 112776 STE 09 SA · submitted 10 February 2022 · Closed · from registration SM35286 (SmartCentres REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35286: 494 Gilbert Ave. Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 112776 STE 09 SA at 498 Gilbert Ave: Site Plan Approval for a 6-storey self-storage facility having a non-residential gross floor area of 15,811 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 494 Gilbert Ave. Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 494 GILBERT AVE
- application_address
- 494 GILBERT AVE
498 Gilbert Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 112776 STE 09 SA · submitted 10 February 2022 · Closed · from registration SM35301 (SmartCentres REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35301: 494 Gilbert Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 112776 STE 09 SA at 498 Gilbert Ave: Site Plan Approval for a 6-storey self-storage facility having a non-residential gross floor area of 15,811 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 494 Gilbert Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 494 GILBERT AVE
- application_address
- 494 GILBERT AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.