Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
287 Richmond St West
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64806, -79.39298
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 281 RICHMOND ST W (6 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Vaughan | Councillor staff | 8 | 2 | 24 October 2011 |
| Office of Council Vaughan, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 6 | 2 | 13 September 2010 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 3 November 2010 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM14772 | Richmond-Peter Inc | 287 Richmond Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 July 2010 – 21 July 2011 | 7 |
| SM14228 | Malibu Investments Inc. | 287 Richmond St West | Richmond-Peter Planning & Development - Zoning Bylaw, Site Plan | 20 April 2010 – 31 December 2016 | 0 |
| SM13472 | Richmond-Peter Inc | 287 Richmond Street West. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 11 September 2009 – 10 August 2014 | 9 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 7 August 2009Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 09 154905 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 154905 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 August 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
117 Peter St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
09 154905 STE 20 OZ · submitted 7 August 2009 · Closed · from registration SM13472 (Richmond-Peter Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM13472: Proposal for mixed used building located at 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 154905 STE 20 OZ at 117 Peter St: The revised application proposes a 36-storey mixed use building containing retail and office use in 4-storey podium and a 32-storey residential tower, 223 parking spaces are proposed underground. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposal for mixed used building located at 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 117 PETER ST
- application_address
- 117 PETER ST
117 Peter St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
09 154905 STE 20 OZ · submitted 7 August 2009 · Closed · from registration SM14772 (Richmond-Peter Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14772: Proposal for mixed use building located at 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 154905 STE 20 OZ at 117 Peter St: The revised application proposes a 36-storey mixed use building containing retail and office use in 4-storey podium and a 32-storey residential tower, 223 parking spaces are proposed underground. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposal for mixed use building located at 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 117 PETER ST
- application_address
- 117 PETER ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.