Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
23 Park Lawn Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.62383, -79.48283
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 27 February 2019 |
| Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 October 2017 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM24560 | First Capital Holdings Trust (Ontario) Inc. | 23 Park Lawn Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 12 May 2017 – 12 May 2025 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 7 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 131744 WET 03 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 19 May 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 146488 WET 03 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 19 May 2020Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 20 146496 WET 03 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 December 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 277843 WET 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 131744 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 7 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 146488 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 May 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 146496 WET 03 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 19 May 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 13 277843 WET 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 December 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2150 Lake Shore Blvd W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 146488 WET 03 OZ · submitted 19 May 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM23889 (First capital Realty)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23889: The applications relate to 2150 Lake Shore Blvd. West and the proposal to amend the Official Plan & Zoning By-law to permit a mixed use community development. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 146488 WET 03 OZ at 2150 Lake Shore Blvd W: An Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application in order to redesignate the lands (from Regeneration Areas to Mixed Use Areas and Parks and Open Spaces) for a new GO Station as well as to permit an intensified mixed-use development which would include mid-rise and tall buildings (including… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: The applications relate to 2150 Lake Shore Blvd. West and the proposal to amend the Official Plan & Zoning By-law to permit a mixed use community development.
Matched fields
- address
- 2150 LAKE SHORE BLVD W
- application_address
- 2150 LAKE SHORE BLVD W
Council and committee items naming this address
- Conveyance of Parkland - 2150 and 2194 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road - by Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks2023.MM13.24 · 15 December 2023
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | 1,629 | 70% (n=10) | 30% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 19% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.