Address · Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
2200 Islington Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
- Location
- 43.71075, -79.55794
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 21 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 2 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 7 | 5 | 17 July 2018 |
| Vincent Crisanti | Member of council | 4 | 1 | 12 March 2024 |
| Mayor | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 13 April 2022 |
| Ward 12 York South-Weston | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 22 May 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Crisanti, Ward 1 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 9 April 2018 |
| Ward 1 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 9 April 2018 |
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 April 2018 |
| Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 30 April 2018 |
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 April 2018 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 23 March 2018 |
| City Legal | City staff | 1 | 0 | 6 April 2022 |
| Corporate Services | City staff | 1 | 0 | 3 March 2021 |
| Councillor Di Giorgio, Ward 12 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 19 April 2018 |
| Councillor Ford | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 15 April 2021 |
| Councillor Ford, Ward 2 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 18 April 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Di Giorgio, Ward 12 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 19 April 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Doucette, Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 30 April 2018 |
| Create TO | Local board | 1 | 0 | 3 March 2021 |
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 21 March 2018 |
| Brad Bradford | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 11 December 2024 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 13 July 2023 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM29965 | Rice Group | 2200 Islington Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Real Estate / Property (City-owned) | 14 April 2020 – 17 July 2023 | 7 |
| SM25839 | Rice Commercial Group Limited | 2200 Islington Avenue | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 12 March 2018 – 19 August 2020 | 7 |
| SM25765 | Rice Commercial Group Limited | 2200 Islington Avenue | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 6 March 2018 – 31 December 2018 | 5 |
| SM23409 | Rice Commercial Group Limited | 2200 Islington Ave. | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App… | 5 August 2016 – 31 July 2027 | 18 |
| SM18963 | CR Islington Inc | 2200 Islington Avenue. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 27 February 2013 – 17 November 2016 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 15 November 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0049/23EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 October 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 206369 WET 01 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 November 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 255712 WET 01 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 July 2017Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 17 207652 WET 02 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 December 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 277902 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0049/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 15 November 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 20 206369 WET 01 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 255712 WET 01 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 November 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 207652 WET 02 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 28 July 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 277902 WET 02 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 December 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2260 Islington Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 255712 WET 01 SA · submitted 29 November 2019 · Closed · from registration SM23409 (Rice Commercial Group Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23409: The property is located at 2200 Islington Ave. We have recently acquired it and will continuing with the processing of applications on record under reference number 13 277902 WET 02 OZ (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 255712 WET 01 SA at 2260 Islington Ave: The development of new 1 to 2 storey commercial buildings and a gas bar supported by a two level parking structure for a portion of the site and surface level parking for the eastern portion of the site. There are three POPS along Rexdale Blvd. The proposal includes new streets and is tied to the I… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: The property is located at 2200 Islington Ave. We have recently acquired it and will continuing with the processing of applications on record under reference number 1…
Matched fields
- address
- 2200 ISLINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 2200 ISLINGTON AVE
2260 Islington Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 255712 WET 01 SA · submitted 29 November 2019 · Closed · from registration SM29965 (Rice Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29965: Planning application at 2200 Islington Avenue and reconfiguration of the Islington/Rexdale intersection. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 255712 WET 01 SA at 2260 Islington Ave: The development of new 1 to 2 storey commercial buildings and a gas bar supported by a two level parking structure for a portion of the site and surface level parking for the eastern portion of the site. There are three POPS along Rexdale Blvd. The proposal includes new streets and is tied to the I… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application at 2200 Islington Avenue and reconfiguration of the Islington/Rexdale intersection.
Matched fields
- address
- 2200 ISLINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 2200 ISLINGTON AVE
57 Rexdale Blvd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 277902 WET 02 OZ · submitted 13 December 2013 · Closed · from registration SM23409 (Rice Commercial Group Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM23409: The property is located at 2200 Islington Ave. We have recently acquired it and will continuing with the processing of applications on record under reference number 13 277902 WET 02 OZ (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 277902 WET 02 OZ at 57 Rexdale Blvd: The Development of 18 new low-rise commercial buildings and a gas bar supported by surface parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …. We have recently acquired it and will continuing with the processing of applications on record under reference number 13 277902 WET 02 OZ
- particulars: The property is located at 2200 Islington Ave. We have recently acquired it and will continuing with the processing of applications on record under reference number 1…
Matched fields
- file_number
- 13 277902 WET 02 OZ
- address
- 2200 ISLINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 2200 ISLINGTON AVE
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 1
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1
4 lobbied · 12 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.