Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
2175 Keele St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.69668, -79.47386
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
7These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 12 York South-Weston | Member of council | 10 | 8 | 20 March 2018 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 3 October 2018 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 4 October 2018 |
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 6 March 2017 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 7 March 2017 |
| Ward 5 York South-Weston | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 5 February 2019 |
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 17 January 2024 |
All registrations· 7 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35124 | Diamondcorp | 2175 Keele Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium | 8 December 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 1 |
| SM26784 | Daniels Humber River Corporation | 2175 Keele Street | Building Permits | 3 October 2018 – 30 May 2019 | 1 |
| SM26698 | Diamond Corp | 2175 Keele Street. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 24 September 2018 – 24 September 2020 | 3 |
| SM24268 | Diamondcorp | 2175 Keele Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 26 March 2017 – 31 December 2026 | 8 |
| SM23283 | Daniels Humber River Corporation | 2175 Keele Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 23 June 2016 – 29 December 2017 | 1 |
| SM22511 | Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2 | 2175 Keele Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 20 November 2015 – 17 November 2017 | 5 |
| SM22502 | Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2 | 2175 Keele Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 17 November 2015 – 27 March 2017 | 6 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
10- Submitted 5 October 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 211278 WET 05 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 14 March 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 123021 WET 05 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 January 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 103239 WET 05 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 May 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0262/21EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 5 February 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 113100 WET 05 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 May 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0043/18EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 28 March 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 135986 WET 12 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 February 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 116336 WET 12 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 October 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 239429 WET 12 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 October 2015Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 15 239454 WET 12 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 10 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 211278 WET 05 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 5 October 2023 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 23 123021 WET 05 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 14 March 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 22 103239 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 January 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0262/21EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 11 May 2021 | Closed Approved |
| 21 113100 WET 05 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 5 February 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0043/18EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 3 May 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 18 135986 WET 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 March 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 116336 WET 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 February 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 239429 WET 12 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 October 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 239454 WET 12 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 19 October 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
0 Canon Jackson Dr · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
23 211278 WET 05 CD · submitted 5 October 2023 · Draft Plan Approved · from registration SM35124 (Diamondcorp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35124: 2175 Keele Street Housing Options (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 211278 WET 05 CD at 0 Canon Jackson Dr: This application relates to the third phase of Keelesdale and will include 172 residential units in four buildings (two midrise buildings and two stacked back to back townhouse buildings). At this time, Daniels is submitting this draft plan of condominium application for the third and final phase o… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2175 Keele Street Housing Options
Matched fields
- address
- 2175 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2175 KEELE ST
2175 Keele St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 239429 WET 12 OZ · submitted 19 October 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22511 (Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22511: Re 2175 Keele Street Development proposal of mix of mid-rise condo & 3 storey back-to-back stacked townhouses. New public road dividing north/south parcels Proposed public park at the end of the road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 239429 WET 12 OZ at 2175 Keele St: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Bylaw to permit the development of residential buildings (apartments and stacked townhouses) ranging in height from 3 to 8-storeys. An underground parking garage would be provided. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re 2175 Keele Street Development proposal of mix of mid-rise condo & 3 storey back-to-back stacked townhouses. New public road dividing nort…
Matched fields
- address
- 2175 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2175 KEELE ST
2175 Keele St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 239429 WET 12 OZ · submitted 19 October 2015 · Closed · from registration SM23283 (Daniels Humber River Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23283: 2175 Keele Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 239429 WET 12 OZ at 2175 Keele St: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Bylaw to permit the development of residential buildings (apartments and stacked townhouses) ranging in height from 3 to 8-storeys. An underground parking garage would be provided. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2175 Keele Street
Matched fields
- address
- 2175 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2175 KEELE ST
2175 Keele St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 239429 WET 12 OZ · submitted 19 October 2015 · Closed · from registration SM26698 (Diamond Corp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26698: Assisting with the development of 2175 Keele Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 239429 WET 12 OZ at 2175 Keele St: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Bylaw to permit the development of residential buildings (apartments and stacked townhouses) ranging in height from 3 to 8-storeys. An underground parking garage would be provided. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 2175 Keele Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 2175 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2175 KEELE ST
2175 Keele St · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
15 239454 WET 12 SB · submitted 19 October 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22511 (Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22511: Re 2175 Keele Street Development proposal of mix of mid-rise condo & 3 storey back-to-back stacked townhouses. New public road dividing north/south parcels Proposed public park at the end of the road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 239454 WET 12 SB at 2175 Keele St: Draft Plan of Subdivision to create 7 blocks to accomodate residential buildings (apartments and stacked townhouses) ranging in height from 3 to 8-storeys, an underground parking garage, and public streets (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re 2175 Keele Street Development proposal of mix of mid-rise condo & 3 storey back-to-back stacked townhouses. New public road dividing nort…
Matched fields
- address
- 2175 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2175 KEELE ST
2175 Keele St · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
15 239454 WET 12 SB · submitted 19 October 2015 · Closed · from registration SM23283 (Daniels Humber River Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23283: 2175 Keele Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 239454 WET 12 SB at 2175 Keele St: Draft Plan of Subdivision to create 7 blocks to accomodate residential buildings (apartments and stacked townhouses) ranging in height from 3 to 8-storeys, an underground parking garage, and public streets (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2175 Keele Street
Matched fields
- address
- 2175 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2175 KEELE ST
2175 Keele St · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
15 239454 WET 12 SB · submitted 19 October 2015 · Closed · from registration SM26698 (Diamond Corp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26698: Assisting with the development of 2175 Keele Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 239454 WET 12 SB at 2175 Keele St: Draft Plan of Subdivision to create 7 blocks to accomodate residential buildings (apartments and stacked townhouses) ranging in height from 3 to 8-storeys, an underground parking garage, and public streets (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 2175 Keele Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 2175 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2175 KEELE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 5
2 lobbied · 3 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 5
8 lobbied · 137 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 137 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 5
1 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 5
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.